Editorial policy

Prime Policy Review aims to make public policy legible without flattening its complexity. We value accurate wording, fair context, and a clear distinction between what is known, what is interpreted, and what remains uncertain.

Accuracy and context

We check names of concepts, institutional roles, and descriptions of policy against appropriate source material before publication. We explain the context needed to understand a claim and avoid implying that an example proves a general rule. If information is incomplete, contested, or dependent on place and time, the writing should say so plainly.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for the publication's readers and subject matter. A partnership or commercial relationship does not determine our conclusions, selection of topics, or wording. We do not present promotional claims as independent editorial judgment.

Corrections

If you find a factual error or a passage that could mislead, contact us with the relevant article and a clear explanation. We review correction requests and amend published material when warranted, making the nature of a meaningful correction clear to readers.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid, sponsored, or partner-supported material is identified clearly as such and kept distinct from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when they are, they are labelled. Illustrations are not evidence for factual claims.